New parties oppose speedy border treaty ratification ({{commentsTotal}})


The Free Party and the Conservative People's Party (EKRE) said Estonia should not rush ahead with the Estonian-Russian border treaty ratification.

Russia last week sent a bill for the ratification of the treaty to its Parliament and the two nations have said they will finalize the treaty simultaneously.

“If we look at the experience of not only European states but around the world, then the norm is that nations' borders are not only defined geographically and physically but also legally,” Hannes Hanso, who is the likely candidate to head the Estonian Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee, said.

Marko Mihkelson, the current chairman of the committee, said it is in Estonia's interest to fix the border legally as it will then be possible to begin building up the exact border, he added. According to the signed, but not ratified treaty, the border between the two nations will shift a little.

Martin Helme, head of EKRE's Parliament faction, said the Estonian Parliament should not ratify the treaty as it is disadvantageous to Estonia and against the country's constitution, which says Estonia's land border should run along the Treaty of Tartu lines.

Helme said the Supreme Court should first rule whether there is a conflict with the constitution. He added that EKRE will not rule out using filibustering tactics and turning to the courts to stop the ratification process.

Andres Herkel, head of the Free Party, said his party does not see the reasoning behind ratification at a time when Russia has not stopped hostilities in Ukraine.

On the border, 128.6 hectares of land, roughly the size of Tallinn's Old Town, and 11.4 square kilometers of lakes will be swapped.

Estonia will gain a boot-shaped piece of land near Värska, which currently belongs to Russia, but has a road cut through it used by Estonians, although it is not allowed for people driving through to stop.

Amendments will also be made on Peipsi lake to make life easier for fishermen.

Talks on a border treaty began in the early 90s, but have been derailed for political reasons. This is the third attempt.

Editor: J.M. Laats

+{{cc.replyToName}} {{cc.body}}
No comments yet.
Logged in as {{user.alias}}. Log out
Login failed

Register user/reset password

Name needs to be fewer than 32 characters long
Comment needs to be fewer than 600 characters long

Independence Day: Estonia’s way into the future isn’t a race

There is a lack of connection between the Estonian state, and the people who live here. While it expects a lot of the state, Estonian society doesn’t seem ready to contribute, writes Viktor Trasberg.

Lotman: Security academy would be crucial Estonian identity point in Narva

In an opinion piece published by Eesti Päevaleht, Tallinn University professor Mihhail Lotman found it important to overcome the mental barrier separating Ida-Viru County from the rest of Estonia.

About us

Staff & contacts | Comments rules

Would you like to contribute an article, a feature, or an opinion piece?

Let us know: