Auditor General's speech to the Parliament regarding Estonia's current issues

Alar Karis (Postimees/Scanpix)
Alar Karis
11/21/2014 12:20 PM
Category: Opinion

ERR.News releases Auditor General Alar Karis's full speech to the Estonian parliament, regarding problems in Estonia’s public finance, economy and development.

Dear Chairman, members of the Parliament,

A year has passed and once again I stand before you with the annual report of the National Audit Office, which gives a concise and comprehensive overview of our state accountancy, public finance and other problems generalized as a result of the audit. No, this report does not consist of one sentence: “Everything is fine and the future is bright!” The report of the National Audit Office does not say this now and probably will not say it in the future either.

The reason for this is the universal role of supreme audit institutions in the state and the nature of our activities – we represent an unbiased and independent view. Above all, our task is to point out to decision-makers problems that need solutions. Nevertheless, in the interests of balance, I will start with the good things.

State accountancy is good, public finance is good, tax revenue is coming in well and figures indicate that people have more work – all of this is good. People are buying more things, which is also good. Prices are increasing slowly or not at all, and this is good for those who buy things, but - this is not the whole picture. When we take a closer look at these topics, we must admit that the picture is no longer as clear. Instead, it is becoming quite a bit more complicated.

In summary – state accountancy and the associated reports are in order in terms of figures, but we know little about what has been done for the money. More precisely, we only know what we have been shown.

Our public finance, which in terms of most benchmark indicators is a front runner in Europe and perhaps the world, is starting to become an object of discussion. Can we give the European Commission a convincing explanation as to why the budget calculated the Estonian way is in structural balance while this is not the case in the opinion of the European Commission?

The increase in the number of working people and the remuneration received for work is certainly very positive. However, is this trend a permanent one and does it meet our economic policy expectations? We could be certain this was a trend if the increase in jobs and wages were created by smart and export-oriented companies that generated higher-than-average added value and whose innovative organization of work guaranteed the best productivity in Europe.

Unfortunately, Estonia has not made much progress in terms of added value and innovation in recent years. The new Finance Minister of the government also wrote about the outlooks of the Estonian economy in her blog half a year ago and admitted with concern that, and I quote: “Estonia’s economic outlooks for the near future are poor. There are several reasons for this.” End quote. I have no reason to doubt the words of the minister.

In light of the above, it is important to acknowledge that the way we spend must be wise and such that it allows the state to make life better for all of the people in Estonia.

Checking the use and preservation of state assets has meant more than counting the cash in the state treasury for a long time. The main task of the National Audit Office is to honestly highlight the ‘buts’ and risks in governance. Many people may not like this, but liking it or not liking it cannot be a criterion used to measure the quality of the reports and work of the National Audit Office.

That is why I am telling you that the speed of Estonia’s economic development is slowing down and coming to a standstill, and indecisiveness is an obstacle to our development. Of course, selecting a reference base for assessing what is going on in society is extremely difficult. That is why the National Audit Office tries to make as few such choices as possible beyond the criteria that the government has established for itself.

When we say that Estonia did not manage to get much closer to the average indicators of Europe in 2013, we are referring to convergence or the understanding of catching up with Europe which the government included in the competitiveness plan ‘Estonia 2020’.

Dear members of the Parliament,

Let us not forget that rankings and comparison with others are not the be-all and end-all, even if we are comparing ourselves to similar countries like Latvia and Lithuania. What really matters is what our present situation is like, whether we can carry on successfully and how can we do so. This is an extremely important question when we look at the development of the Estonian economy and the resulting improvements in the well-being of us all.

Taking a look back to the early 1990s, we can of course admit that we have achieved growth in the gross domestic product per person with breakneck speed. Income has also increased considerably since independence was regained. And yet we are only halfway to where we would like to be.

These bursts of acceleration have not been without losses, be it the mental and physical health of people, social relations, the environment or elsewhere. Are we ready for further acceleration, which should be even more forceful than before if we want to get to the top, or would being smart suffice? I do not know the answer to this, but I do know that we have spent remarkable amounts of European Union support on developing our economy, including promotion of innovation and exports. Sometimes successfully and sometimes not, but that is as it normally is. However, it is not normal that we have failed to take the most important thing from this experience – the knowledge of how to be successful in the future. How can we be successful more efficiently?

Our previous Finance Minister also pointed out this problem. He recently said that investments, i.e. the distribution of money, are not a substitute for reforms and that it was only smart investing activities that would provide us with the economic growth and jobs we expect. I quote: “We should start with an honest assessment of our economic situation and make decisions that can sometimes be painful, but that must be made.” End quote.

Sound familiar? I believe this is exactly the issue I emphasized in the overview last year – what kind of state can we afford? I must say that six months has passed and this question has still not been answered.
However, our new acceleration must proceed from smarter and more efficient actions.

In this year’s report I have in many areas drawn attention to problems associated with a lack of knowledge. For example, the reorganization of the education system has in some sense started, but where exactly it should lead us, what should be accomplished as a result and when – we still do not know. Activities surrounding the development of the oil shale sector and the environmental charges can be characterized in the same manner.

The deadlines by which decisions must be made have been politically determined, but many of the comprehensive health, environmental and socioeconomic impacts necessary for making decisions are unclear, as are the circumstances that influence energy independence.

The reorganization of the field of education and the oil shale sector described in the report of the National Audit Office are also linked by a problematic common feature that may remain hidden at first glance – there is no cooperation in state governance.

In the case of the oil shale sector, this means poor cooperation between the Finance Minister and Environment Minister in the development of the model for receiving fair revenue from oil shale. In the area of education, cooperation between the Ministry of Education and Research, the Ministry of Finance and local authorities is insufficient to guarantee that the model for streamlining the school network and funding the area of education will guarantee in the end that teachers are well paid, valued and motivated, and that there are enough teachers to educate our younger generations.

The problems faced by a state that is small, with an open economy and sparsely populated are neatly summed up in the ‘Governments of the Future’ study of the Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra. It concludes that the present ‘tower silo-based’ organization of governance can no longer cope with the problems faced by the state – be it guaranteeing social security, organisation of health services or education.

I would like to speak some more about education and teachers. There is no doubt in this hall or in Estonia as a whole that the key to our future success lies in education. I will start with the positives.

The efforts being made to increase the salaries of teachers deserve to be mentioned. Agreement on substantive trends in the lifelong learning strategy is very welcome. However, when we take a closer look at the strategy, we are left facing an elementary problem: how do we measure and describe the income of teachers?

The data obtained from both official and publicly accessible sources suggest that a teacher must be equated with an education worker, i.e. a much larger quantity, which covers more than a teacher standing in front of a class.

When we add the different sources of data about calculated or actually paid remuneration, we obtain disputable results that cause confusion and arguments. The real problem here is that we do not have an indicator that clearly characterizes the changes in the salaries of teachers.

Although the government has recently made efforts to increase the salaries of teachers, which has also increased average wages, the big picture - e.g. a comparison of OECD countries for which the most recent data can be obtained - indicates that Estonian teachers are unfortunately firmly in last place in terms of their income.

When we audit the area of education, we see that another sad fact in addition to the financial side is that our brightest young people do not choose the profession and career of a teacher, and our teaching staff are slowly but surely aging.

If we add the mess that the streamlining of the school network has become, which in real life is evident in the unequal accessibility and variable quality of education, we cannot help but ask why the central government has decided to sit on the fence when it comes to solving the problems in our education system. Is it a political choice or indecisiveness? Or is indecisiveness a political choice? In any case, such behavior comes at a price and its impact is far-reaching.

The is no doubt that evolutionary development has its advantages and we all know from natural science that it guarantees the survival of the strongest and most adaptable. Unfortunately, this is not the most reasonable approach to governing one’s state. We do not have to look far to find an example. This example, which we had to bring up again in our report, is of course local government reform.

I previously spoke about the lack of knowledge in the areas of the economy, education and oil shale, but when it comes to local government reform we have gathered more than enough knowledge about the subject over the years. What we do not have is a decision about active intervention by the state. Coming back to the need to increase Estonia’s development at its present rate, or an even faster rate, we must realize that regional development which is reasonable and considers the unique features of different places in Estonia is a precondition to success as well as a contribution to improving the well-being of Estonian people. Without local government reform, access to public services will become increasingly unequal for Estonian people and their quality will be even more uneven.

Dear listeners, in this year’s speech I will not focus on the big problems in financing the social sphere, including the health system, that we are all aware of. You can read about them in the report of the National Audit Office. You heard about the issues concerning the work ability reform in the debate held in this very place last week, as well as earlier today when you were working on drafts. You can also read about the problems concerning the accessibility of source data and the shortcomings in the audits that guarantee the security of information systems in the report. These topics of the area of information and communication technology highlighted in the report of the National Audit Office are just the introduction. The National Audit Office intends to take a broader look at the development trends of e-Estonia in the coming years.

Dear Parliament,

I have told you before that the representatives of the coalition parties of the Parliament in particular should be interested in the activities of the executive power being more knowledge-based. I do so once again and expand this thought to the composition of the Parliament as a whole. You are the ones who can demand knowledge-based behavior from the executive power, e.g. by refusing to accept drafts with inadequate impact assessments or one-sided reports.

You are the ones who make the final decisions about massive reforms and you can therefore dictate the speed of these reforms. And the National Audit Office wants to continue as a useful partner to you in this work, including with this report.

But let us come back to partnership. The comparative study of the impact of performance audits carried out among Nordic supreme audit institutions was introduced to me recently. Approximately 120 Estonian officials who have been involved in the audits carried out by the National Audit Office gave their opinions in this study.

I would like to highlight two remarkable circumstances: firstly, the performance audits of the Estonian National Audit Office cause changes to a relatively large extent, especially in comparison to other Nordic countries; and secondly, Estonia clearly stands out for the fact that members of the Parliament do not use the information presented in the audits to bring about changes and to make the executive power take responsibility for its actions.

A shining example, and not in the good sense, is the discussion that took place at the session of the state budget review committee held in the conference hall of the Parliament this year. The focus was on the observations made and the problems highlighted by the National Audit Office in the e-health audit, and the session was attended by members of the committees of the Parliament as well as senior managers and senior officials from the Estonian health sector. The Ministry of Social Affairs sent the official who was performing the tasks of a head of department to the session as its representative. The official who was placed in this complicated situation did very well. However, no matter how well an official does, they cannot give any binding promises to change the situation to the Parliament on behalf of the minister. And this, honorable Parliament members, is not acceptable behavior. You should not put accept it, and the National Audit Office cannot accept it.

This is why I invite you to have further discussions on the National Audit Office’s audits in the presence of the Secretary General or the Minister, because the majority of the recommendations made by the National Audit Office in its reports are aimed at the Minister. I also expect the work of the Parliament and the National Audit Office to lead to more stringency regarding the information presented by the government. We must not accept empty reports or hollow explanations that do not give us a true overview of the situation and the preparation of which is a useless waste of time and taxpayers’ money.

I would like to assure you that we will continue developing the competencies of our auditors and improving the manner in which we inform of the results of the National Audit Office’s performance. I still find it important that the capability to audit the area of internal security and defense is established in the National Audit Office. Boosting capability in these areas depends largely on the decisions of the Finance Committee of the Parliament and the Parliament itself.

And last but not least, this year we have highlighted the specific recommendations more clearly in our report in addition to pointing out problems. Take them as reminders, inspiration or solutions from which to shape suitable drafts or opinions for decision-making. I can also assure you that the National Audit Office will continue to keep an eye on the development of important areas and highlight risks and problems so that all of you in this hall can do your jobs as well as possible.

I would like to remind you once again before the impending elections that all of the reports of the National Audit Office can be assessed easily and free of charge on its website. I urge you to read them in order to further government culture in Estonia and to make better decisions. Do so bravely, publicly and consistently – not like the peasants in the orchard of Rector Odja, so brilliantly described by August Gailit in his novel ‘Ekke Moor’.

Thank you for your time.

Alar Karis is Estonia's Auditor General. He gave the speech in front of the parliament on November 12.

The name field cannot be empty
No more than 50 characters
Comment field cannot be empty
No more than 50 characters
Comment field cannot be empty
No more than 1024 characters

Message forwarded to the editor

This Ip-address has limited access

See also

There are no comments yet. Be the first!

Reply to comment

Reply to comment

Laadi juurde ({{take2}})
The name field cannot be empty
No more than 50 characters
Comment field cannot be empty
No more than 1024 characters
Add new comment
  • foto
    Opinion digest: Estonia’s stagnating politics

    Estonia’s largest political parties had been going through the most serious crisis in their existence, and on top of that they had lost their most important function, namely to formulate a vision of the country’s future, daily Postimees wrote in its Friday editorial.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Putin exploiting power vacuum created by U.S. presidential elections

    According to director of Tallinn’s International Centre for Defence and Security and former ambassador to Russia, Jüri Luik, the increased tensions over the past few weeks between Russia and the West indicate Putin’s wish to exploit the ambiguous mood before the U.S. presidential elections as much as possible.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Time to return to discussing serious issues

    In a stinging opinion piece in published in the daily Eesti Päevaleht, member of the Riigikogu Eerik-Niiles Kross (Reform) condemned the Estonian media as well as the country’s elites for their obsession with what he sees as pointless topics, while disregarding the last few weeks’ unsettling developments concerning Russia.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Legally speaking, everything is proper

    After Toomas Hendrik Ilves’ decade in office, and after he promoted Estonia like no other president did before him, his legacy is now tainted by the fact that he seems to have gone for a substantial state grant in 2006 that he never put to use — and of which he will now pay back just a tenth.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Closer to Warsaw, farther away from Estonia

    In a recent opinion piece in daily Postimees, columnist Ahto Lobjakas wrote that one way to look at Rail Baltic was as a step towards the level other countries had already reached in terms of speed and comfort of their railway connections. The main weakness of this point of view was the fact that in Estonia, it lacked the necessary social context.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Leadership change in Reform needed for potential coalition with Center Party

    For a potential future coalition with the Center Party, the Reform Party needed to change its leader as well, Social Democratic MP and chairman of the Riigikogu’s Foreign Affairs Committee Sven Mikser wrote in a comment on social media on Friday.

  • foto
    Matthew Crandall: President Ilves’ global impact

    The greatest accomplishment of President Toomas Hendrik Ilves is that he branded Estonia as a modern and innovative 21st century country, and brought it out of post-Soviet obscurity, writes Tallinn University’s Matthew Crandall.

  • foto
    The shackles of history and modern life in the fast lane: Estonia's experience in the migration crisis

    The uncertain public performances of Estonian politicians and poor explanatory work were to blame for a considerable increase in public distrust during the migration crisis, found ERR journalist Greete Palmiste, working in Bremen on an international journalists' exchange, in an opinion piece written for German publication taz.die Tageszeitung.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Kersti Kaljulaid on the concepts of ethical nationalism and confident Estonians

    On Friday, Aug. 12, Estonian representative to the European Court of Auditors Kersti Kaljulaid delivered a patriotic speech on the Postimees Stage at the 2016 Opinion Festival in Paide in which she expanded on two words and two respective ideas she found important for her country that were represented by the two letter Es in its native-language name Eesti: eetiline (ethical) and enesekindel (confident).

  • foto
    This mess we're in: Picking up the pieces after Saturday's elections

    From Saturday’s election fiasco to Tuesday’s sudden emergence of a likely cross-party candidate: ERR News editor Dario Cavegn makes an attempt at explaining Estonia’s seemingly chaotic quest to find its next president.

  • foto
    Opinion: The decline of Estonian as a language of science starts abroad

    The Estonian language as a language of science is only sustainable in those subject areas that offer undergraduate courses in Estonian, and with which students begin their university education, finds ERR science portal editor Marju Himma.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Current approach to reform won't help municipalities

    The Center Party’s presidential candidate, Mailis Reps, wrote in an opinion piece published in daily Postimees on Sunday that the Administrative Reform Act was a disappointment to Estonia’s municipalities, and that relations between local and central government were in a crisis.

  • foto
    Opinion: Jüri Nikolajev in response to the Ida-Viru secret memo

    Describing himself as "wearily spiteful" instead of angry, ERR's Narva correspondent Jüri Nikolajev responded to the top secret memo on Ida-Viru County that leaked recently, calling Estonians to figuratively not leave their property laying around if they did not want anyone else to take it for themselves.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Sulev Vedler on the secret memo on Ida-Viru County

    In 2015, the Government Security Committee received a secret memo containing a dark assessment of the future of Ida-Viru County, Estonia's most northeastern and predominantly Russian-speaking county, which was compiled by Ilmar Raag, who worked as a strategic communicatins advisor at the Stenbock House at the time. Estonian journalist Sulev Vedler responded to the memo by compiling various reactions to issues it addressed.

  • foto
    Opinion: Alo Lõhmus on the definition of Estonian citizen by blood

    Journalist Alo Lõhmus explored the right to Estonian citizenship by "jus sanguinis," Latin for right of blood, as it relates to one's eligibility to run for president — an issue which has had particular attention drawn to it recently after members of a competing political party attempted to cast doubt on the status of presidential candidate Marina Kaljurand's Estonian citizenship.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Erkki Bahovski on Finland and the alleged Baltic scheming

    Columnist Erkki Bahovski commented on the curious, decidedly defensive turn that seemed to be taken by Finland's Social Democrats following the release of a lengthy report by the Finnish Institute of International Affairs (UPI) which suggested that Russia, in its own self-interest, is attempting to hamper Finland's total integration with the West.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Siim Kallas thinks real estate tax effective way to finance local government

    The Reform Party’s presidential candidate, Siim Kallas, said in an opinion piece published in daily Postimees that an estate tax, more precisely a tax levied on real estate, could be considered to finance local government.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Siret Kotka on the support, or lack thereof, for Estonia's farmers

    Vice-Chairman of the Riigikogu’s Rural Affairs Committee MP Siret Kotka (Center) found that while Estonia's farmers have recently suffered one blow after another, the current Estonian government owes them more support than they have been paid, and likewise found that it is precisely domestically grown food that should make up the backbone of Estonian security.

  • foto
    Dario Cavegn: The intellectual crisis and editors’ internal conflict

    Iivi Anna Masso’s piece published on Sept. 6 is unfit for publication. ERR News editor Dario Cavegn explains this verdict, and why it ended up getting published anyway.

  • foto
    Iivi Anna Masso: The migration crisis and liberals' internal conflict

    Columnist Iivi Anna Masso asks why people with a liberal world view couldn't support freedom of movement for work, studies, marriage, and genuine political asylum while at the same time support more effective protection of European cultural values.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Hanneli Rudi makes case for starting school a year younger

    Prompted by the arrival of September 1, the first day of school for children across Estonia, Hanneli Rudi reflected on how kindergarten is simply a good way for schools to make money in light of the fact that it has been deemed unnecessary for most children's development, and that perhaps the country should instead consider having children start first grade one year younger, at age six.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Mikk Salu on the open secret of Estonia’s emergency underpreparedness

    Journalist Mikk Salu recently addressed an issue about which it seems like many in the country are whispering but no one will come out and say — that despite appearances to the contrary, Estonia's military, law enforcement agencies, hospitals and other such critical support agencies are woefully understaffed, underequipped and underprepared for the event of a true emergency.

  • foto
    Dario Cavegn: Kaljurand, the reluctant candidate

    Over the past months, there have been several occasions when the Estonian media assumed that Marina Kaljurand, much like everybody else in the country’s government and legislature, was working on some political scheme, aiming to move up in the long term. This is nonsense, writes Dario Cavegn.

  • foto
    Letter from a reader: In favor of paper ballots in e-Estonia

    Reader Virgo Kruve submitted a letter to ERR on Monday evening, following the first round of presidential elections in the Riigikogu, defending the continued use of seemingly relatively antiquated paper ballots in the presidential elections of a country famous precisely for its well-established use of electronic voting in local and parliamentary elections.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Evelyn Sepp on the election cycle and the importance of the president

    Just days before the Estonia’s 2016 presidential elections, which kicked off with the first round of balloting in the Riigikogu on Monday, former politician and MP Evelyn Sepp reflected on how positively this year’s presidential campaign has been handled and why exactly Estonia needs a president in the first place, expounding upon the respective roles of the Riigikogu, the government and the president for context as well.

  • foto
    Opinion digest: Two takes on Angela Merkel’s political personality

    Just in time for Merkel’s visit on Wednesday and Thursday this week, two takes on her character and political convictions have appeared in the Estonian press. In Päevaleht, director Katrin Laur writes about a politically bland, but nevertheless successful woman, and in Ekspress, journalist Külli-Riin Tigasson lists six ethics rules that Merkel has followed.

  • foto
    Marko Mihkelson: A common Europe’s struggle for existence

    Despite both recent and ongoing events which have served to cast doubt in many Europeans on the future of the EU, Estonian MP Marko Mihkelson found that Europe is nonetheless stronger when it stands together, and that in the face of external threats that it cannot prevent, the union must continue to build stronger ties upon the shared desire for peace and stability which serves as its foundation.

  • foto
    Center Party could raise its profile explaining NATO to local Russians

    While 88% of Estonians support increasing NATO’s military presence, most local Russians are against it. That’s 25% of the country’s population. The Center Party could explain to them what caused the increased allied presence, reduce opposition to Estonia’s defense policy, and gain a lot in the process, Erik Gamzejev writes.

  • foto
    Uber is in Estonia for Taxify

    Uber is in Estonia for two reasons: For PR, and to kill Taxify. But the price war it has kicked off just in time for the weekend rush isn't how they're hoping to get the Estonian start-up. It's part of Uber's typical strategy in every market it enters. It will blow over, eventually resulting in higher prices.

  • foto
    Why is anyone surprised? Look to the unilateral decisions of Obama and Merkel for the passage of Brexit

    University of Tartu guest history lecturer Joseph Enge thinks that the UK's vote to leave the European Union is both reasonable and rational, and that it should not come as a surprise. Even more, the current criticism of the voters shows that they are right to leave.