Court to decide Kender case in May ({{contentCtrl.commentsTotal}})

Kaur Kender (left) with his lawyer, Paul Keres, Mar. 23, 2017.
Kaur Kender (left) with his lawyer, Paul Keres, Mar. 23, 2017. Source: (Siim Lõvi/ERR)

The Harju County court decided on Thursday to hand down its verdict in the case of writer Kaur Kender on May 16 this year. Final statements were heard in the case. Kender stands accused of having produced and distributed child pornography with his short story “Untitled-12”.

Kender’s lawyer, Paul Keres, demanded that Kender be acquitted, granted compensatory damages, and that his legal expenses in the amount of €55,000 be covered by the state. The prosecutor, on the other hand, said that Kender’s guilt in the case was evident, and demanded a pecuniary punishment in the amount of €3,939.

“Untited 12”

The North District Prosecutor's Office has accused Kender of having produced child pornography. The subject of the trial is his short story “Untitled 12,” which was published in 2014 and subsequently banned.

Kender’s short story about a pedophile featured what has been called “graphic descriptions” of the sexual abuse of children.

The prosecutor argues that paragraph 178 of the Penal Code, based on which Kender was charged, does not specify that real-life victims have to be involved, and points out that people have been found guilty for the same crime as recently as April 6, 2016.

The defense argues that Kender has been charged arbitrarily and treated unfairly, as the same text the prosecutor considered to be child pornography was distributed and published by another 47 people, among them several well-known members of Estonian society.

Kender points to other literary works to demonstrate that he is being singled out arbitrarily. Both Vladimir Nabokov’s “Lolita” as well as the Marquis de Sade’s “120 Days of Sodom” are freely available, and Nabokov has even portrayed as pleasant what Kender himself portrayed as disgusting, the defense argues.

The defense also argues that there is no basis for prosecution, as neither intent nor the matter of the place where the supposed crime was committed has been addressed. There is no proof that Kender intended to create child pornography, his defense argues.

Kender pleaded not guilty, and has said that he doesn’t understand in what way his work is supposed to be child pornography.

According to Estonia’s Penal Code, the manufacture of child pornography is punishable by a pecuniary punishment or up to three years' imprisonment.

Editor: Dario Cavegn

Hea lugeja, näeme et kasutate vanemat brauseri versiooni või vähelevinud brauserit.

Parema ja terviklikuma kasutajakogemuse tagamiseks soovitame alla laadida uusim versioon mõnest meie toetatud brauserist: