Feature: Russia playing long game in Kerch Strait, Mariupol ({{commentsTotal}})

Russian fighter jets over the Crimean Bridge, 25 November 2018.
Russian fighter jets over the Crimean Bridge, 25 November 2018. Source: Reuters/Scanpix

Russia's military action against Ukraine's relatively small, modestly equipped navy demonstrates once again demonstrates Moscow's unwillingness to solve problems smartly, Rein Oidekivi and Dmitri Teperik of the International Centre for Defence and Security write. Instead, Russia purposely chooses tactics of aggression and intimidation.

This article was first published on the ICDS blog.

The simmering conflict in the Kerch Strait and the Sea of Azov reached a new level on Sunday when Russian forces fired on Ukrainian vessels, injuring at least three Ukrainian sailors and seizing 20 more.

Moscow is not only testing the reactions of Ukrainian leaders, but those of the West, too. Kiev's imposition of martial law in response to this kind of aggression was rather predictable. Since the summer, the Russian media has been reporting that President Petro Poroshenko was preparing a "serious provocation" near the Russian border (Crimea is, of course, understood to be "genuine Russian territory"), after which he would introduce martial law and use it to postpone the presidential election scheduled for March 2019.

According to the Russian media, this would be the only way for him to stay in power. His personal popularity is extremely low, and even the use of "administrative resources" cannot help him maintain power any longer.

In the next few weeks, we will see Moscow´s determination to intensify conflicts between Ukraine's various political forces. At the international level, the Kremlin is testing the values of Western democracies and our will and readiness to protect them, as well as the extent to which the idea of "partnership" has any real meaning.

The events in Ukraine are not just a domestic issue of "Russki Mir" (the claimed Russian sphere of influence; ed.), but a wider European affair that will directly affect our immediate future. Merely "condemning the use of force by the Russian authorities" or encouraging Russia to "refrain from further provocations" sounds like business as usual to Kremlin ears (as it in fact is) and will encourage Moscow to take further steps rather than back down.

Meanwhile, introducing visa sanctions for Russian generals, who are in any case forbidden by their own authorities to leave the country, is rather pointless. Unless sanctions are applied that affect oil and gas production and exports, genuine results in moderating Russia's behaviour shouldn't be expected.

The strategic importance of the city of Mariupol became evident in the course of the war in the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. Without a doubt, the inability of the Russian forces and their proxies to conquer Mariupol completely was one of the major factors preventing further escalation of the war in the Donbass region as well as in eastern and southern Ukraine. Nevertheless, its location on the front line makes Mariupol vulnerable not just militarily, but also socio-economically and demographically.

Not all the pieces of this complex mosaic are easily visible. Dependence on the oligarchic model of mono-industrial business shapes not just the way of life, but also the way of thinking of many citizens. Even in Mariupol, the public considers economic challenges to be more important than the war.

Blocking the harbours of Mariupol and Berdyansk will definitely harm several sectors of Ukraine's economy, including steel and agricultural exports. As of 25 November, there were at least 34 merchant ships (10 of which were operating under the flag of an European Union member state) heading to, coming from, or docked in the international harbours of Mariupol and Berdyansk.

In public perception, Mariupol is a strongly pro-Ukrainian city, but this might be just a superficial impression created by the presence of a substantial contingent of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and by the visibility of those active citizens who really do care about the nation and city's future.

However, there is still a large portion of the population who have either openly or covertly welcomed the arrival of pro-Russian troops, or helped distribute pro-Kremlin propaganda. Even so, in the fear, stress and tensions of the last days, the citizens of Mariupol have evidently felt that the local authorities have kept them ill-informed of the latest developments.

The polarised political mentality of Mariupol's inhabitants does not bode well for this logistically semi-isolated city. Russia knows this very well, and thus sees Mariupol as a symbolically important target. The provocation on the Sea of Azov may have taken place on the water, but its substance is land, the economy and the minds of people both in Ukraine and in the West.

Rein Oidekivi is a research fellow at the International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) in Tallinn, Dmitri Teperik its CEO.

This article was first published on the ICDS blog.

Download the ERR News app for Android and iOS now and never miss an update!

Editor: Dario Cavegn



ERR kasutab oma veebilehtedel http küpsiseid. Kasutame küpsiseid, et meelde jätta kasutajate eelistused meie sisu lehitsemisel ning kohandada ERRi veebilehti kasutaja huvidele vastavaks. Kolmandad osapooled, nagu sotsiaalmeedia veebilehed, võivad samuti lisada küpsiseid kasutaja brauserisse, kui meie lehtedele on manustatud sisu otse sotsiaalmeediast. Kui jätkate ilma oma lehitsemise seadeid muutmata, tähendab see, et nõustute kõikide ERRi internetilehekülgede küpsiste seadetega.
Hea lugeja, näeme et kasutate vanemat brauseri versiooni või vähelevinud brauserit.

Parema ja terviklikuma kasutajakogemuse tagamiseks soovitame alla laadida uusim versioon mõnest meie toetatud brauserist: